The following is a loot rule changes:
- First list is mine with all the changes
- second list is Gath's with all the edits
- Third will show what all we said about the loot rules so you can see our thinking behind it.
Blazze Valkurm Admin replied
564 weeks ago
Blazze Valkurm Admin replied
564 weeks ago
Blazze Valkurm Admin replied
564 weeks ago
Blazze Valkurm Admin replied
564 weeks ago
Blazze: Needslot can bid for it being they are in the positives with their points
Blazze: AND has the highest points.
Blazze: I feel like this could be worded better. I know its a draft… but god damn lol.
L'kho: *It was my understanding of the system that the points cost of a given item would remain static regardless of the number of points possessed by those interested in a given piece. In this case, the member with 28 points would drop to 3 points whether the member with 27 points wanted the item or not. Please clarify.
Blazze:*Ya, 3 points… It is only 25 points to lot an item.3. This is only if both members want the same piece at the time.
L'kho:*Game theory would suggest that any rational member would always express interest in lotting a given piece even if they know another member has higher points if only to ensure that the competing member will have even fewer points after lotting to reduce future potential competition. I believe this should be investigated further.
Blazze:*I think we need to have another officer meeting when you are feeling better Gath, not to sure you put on paper what we talked about in the meeting fully.*Will change to the person with more auto wins and only loses 25 points.*
Blazze: (This will only take place should no T1 Need be in the zone, OR no T1 lots the item.)
L'kho I think the “another member” he is discussing in this case would be the #2 member as mentioned in item 3 above. This category references our discussion regarding allowing a #1 with <0 points to outlot a #2 with points if allowing that #1 to obtain the item would be of great benefit to the FC. Gath’s interpretation is consistent with my own.A. They will have that gear on lock for the next time it drops in ANY case.
Blazze: Not to sure this is what we talked about… They do not lock the item. They get the item that day and drop the points. Not 100% sure where this lock came from.
L'kho: As I mentioned above this is regarding the #2 with points who passed an item to the #1 without points sinceB. They prove how them gaining a piece for their second choice will benefit the FC in a whole
allowing the #1 to have the item was of greater immediate benefit to the group. As we discussed that #2 would lock in the item when it subsequently dropped.
L'kho: My remarks to item 2b would largely negate this.
Blazze: *Indeed, however I see what he was trying to do, but the wording is really bad.All the points you gain
Blazze: All I can say is… I’m glad that we have 2 more weeks to get this in line, because I think we have more work ahead.
Also, I think we need to dumb it down A LOT or many members will just rage quit. I will go back over and make it a bit more simple to read after we go over this more.
Blazze Valkurm Admin replied
565 weeks ago